<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Discrete-Geometry on Yunhai Xiang</title><link>https://yunhaimath.com/tags/discrete-geometry/</link><description>Recent content in Discrete-Geometry on Yunhai Xiang</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 17:13:21 -0400</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://yunhaimath.com/tags/discrete-geometry/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The Disproof of Unit Distance Conjecture</title><link>https://yunhaimath.com/posts/the-disproof-of-unit-distance-conjecture/</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 17:13:21 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://yunhaimath.com/posts/the-disproof-of-unit-distance-conjecture/</guid><description>&lt;aside class="yh-pullquote" style="--yh-pullquote-w: 50%;"&gt;
&lt;div class="yh-pullquote-text"&gt;
Why did the two algebraic geometers get arrested at the airport? Because they were talking about blowing up six points on the plane.
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="yh-pullquote-attrib"&gt;— Anonymous&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/aside&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After learning about the recent OpenAI disproof of the unit distance conjecture &lt;span class="yh-ref" data-ref-kind="bib"
data-cite-key="OpenAI26"&gt;
⟦cite:OpenAI26⟧
&lt;/span&gt;, I want to devote some time to understand some main ideas in this paper. The problem goes back to Erdős's 1946 paper &lt;span class="yh-ref" data-ref-kind="bib"
data-cite-key="Erd46"&gt;
⟦cite:Erd46⟧
&lt;/span&gt;, and the classical upper bound is due to Spencer, Szemerédi, and Trotter &lt;span class="yh-ref" data-ref-kind="bib"
data-cite-key="SST84"&gt;
⟦cite:SST84⟧
&lt;/span&gt;. There are new developments by Will Sawin, who gave a more concrete bound &lt;span class="yh-ref" data-ref-kind="bib"
data-cite-key="Saw26"&gt;
⟦cite:Saw26⟧
&lt;/span&gt;, and there is also a human-verified expository note with expert comments &lt;span class="yh-ref" data-ref-kind="bib"
data-cite-key="ABG&amp;#43;26"&gt;
⟦cite:ABG&amp;#43;26⟧
&lt;/span&gt;. For broader background, see Brass, Moser, and Pach &lt;span class="yh-ref" data-ref-kind="bib"
data-cite-key="BMP05"&gt;
⟦cite:BMP05⟧
&lt;/span&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="main-ideas"&gt;Main Ideas&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For a finite set $P\subseteq\mathbb C$, let
&lt;/p&gt;
$$\nu(P):=\#\{\{x,y\}\subseteq P:|x-y|=1\}\qquad \nu(n)=\mathrm{max}_{\# P=n}\nu(P)$$&lt;p&gt;
Erdos conjectured that $\nu(n)=n^{1+o(1)}$. The result that was shown was the following&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class="math-env style-plain"
data-kind="theorem"
data-lang="en"
data-numbered="true"&gt;
&lt;span class="math-heading"&gt;
&lt;span class="math-title"
data-label='Theorem'&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="math-note"&gt;(OpenAI)&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class="math-body"&gt;
There exists some $\delta&gt;0$ such that $\nu(n)&gt;n^{1+\delta}$ for infinitely many $n$.
&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This disproves Erdos.
Let $f\ge 1$, then in $\mathbb C^f$, denote the polydisc
&lt;/p&gt;
$$B_R=\{(x_1,\dots,x_f)\in\mathbb C^f:\forall i,|x_i|\le R\}$$&lt;p&gt;
and for a (full) lattice $\Lambda\subseteq\mathbb C^f$, define
&lt;/p&gt;
$$U_{\Lambda}=\{(x_1,\dots,x_f)\in\Lambda:\forall i,|x_i|=1\}$$&lt;p&gt;
Let $\pi:\mathbb \Lambda\rightarrow\mathbb C$ be the projection to an arbitrary coordinate and and assume it is injective.
If $\Lambda$ can be found such that $U_\Lambda$ is large, then for $R&gt;1$, the set $P_{\Lambda,R}:=\pi(U_{\Lambda}\cap B_R)$ is a finite set of points with at least $\frac{1}{2}|U_{\Lambda}||\Lambda\cap B_{R-1}|$ unit distance pairs among at most $|U_{\Lambda}\cap B_{R}|$ points. One of the core lemmas in the paper proves an explicit estimate for this type of statement with a translate $a+\Lambda$ of the lattice, and it turns out this estimate is enough to produce the lower bound.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Take a totally real number field $F$ of degree $f$ and form the CM field $K/F$ by quadratic imaginary extension, one can from the Minkowski embedding $K\rightarrow\mathbb C^f$ and form the lattice $\Lambda$ by taking the image of a fractional ideal. If we have find $K$ such that many primes $\mathfrak q$ in $F$ split, then we can find many $u=\frac{\mathfrak q}{\overline{\mathfrak q}}$ of unit norm, so that $U_{\Lambda}$ is big enough. Such fields $K$ are built from Golod–Shafarevich class field towers, which is a tower of CM fields, where ramification is controlled.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="references"&gt;References&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;div class="bib-env"&gt;
&lt;ul class="bib-list"&gt;
&lt;li id="bib-OpenAI26" data-bib-key="OpenAI26"&gt;
&lt;span class="bib-label"&gt;[OpenAI26]&lt;/span&gt;OpenAI. &lt;em&gt;Planar Point Sets with Many Unit Distances&lt;/em&gt;. 2026. &lt;a href="https://cdn.openai.com/pdf/74c24085-19b0-4534-9c90-465b8e29ad73/unit-distance-proof.pdf"&gt;https://cdn.openai.com/pdf/74c24085-19b0-4534-9c90-465b8e29ad73/unit-distance-proof.pdf&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li id="bib-ABG&amp;#43;26" data-bib-key="ABG&amp;#43;26"&gt;
&lt;span class="bib-label"&gt;[ABG&amp;#43;26]&lt;/span&gt;Noga Alon, Thomas F. Bloom, W. T. Gowers, Daniel Litt, Will Sawin, Arul Shankar, Jacob Tsimerman, Victor Wang, and Melanie Matchett Wood. &lt;em&gt;Remarks on the Disproof of the Unit Distance Conjecture&lt;/em&gt;. 2026. &lt;a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.20695"&gt;arXiv:2605.20695&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.20695"&gt;https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.20695&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li id="bib-Saw26" data-bib-key="Saw26"&gt;
&lt;span class="bib-label"&gt;[Saw26]&lt;/span&gt;Will Sawin. &lt;em&gt;An Explicit Lower Bound for the Unit Distance Problem&lt;/em&gt;. 2026. &lt;a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.20579"&gt;arXiv:2605.20579&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.20579"&gt;https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.20579&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li id="bib-Erd46" data-bib-key="Erd46"&gt;
&lt;span class="bib-label"&gt;[Erd46]&lt;/span&gt;Paul Erdős. &lt;em&gt;On Sets of Distances of $n$ Points&lt;/em&gt;. American Mathematical Monthly. 53(5). pp. 248--250. 1946.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li id="bib-SST84" data-bib-key="SST84"&gt;
&lt;span class="bib-label"&gt;[SST84]&lt;/span&gt;Joel Spencer, Endre Szemerédi, and William T. Trotter. Béla Bollobás (ed.). &lt;em&gt;Unit Distances in the Euclidean Plane&lt;/em&gt;. In &lt;em&gt;Graph Theory and Combinatorics&lt;/em&gt;. pp. 293--303. Academic Press. 1984.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li id="bib-BMP05" data-bib-key="BMP05"&gt;
&lt;span class="bib-label"&gt;[BMP05]&lt;/span&gt;Peter Brass, William Moser, and János Pach. &lt;em&gt;Research Problems in Discrete Geometry&lt;/em&gt;. Springer. 2005.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>